---

---

(a)	Share prices shown for JPMorgan Chase’s common stock are from the New York Stock Exchange.

(b)	TBVPS and ROTCE are non-GAAP financial measures. For further discussion of these measures, see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 14–16.

(c)	HQLA represents the amount of assets that qualify for inclusion in the liquidity coverage ratio under the final U.S. rule (“U.S. LCR”) for 3Q15, 2Q15 and 1Q15 as well as the estimated amount as of 4Q14 and 3Q14, prior to the effective date of the final rule. For additional information, see HQLA on page 76.

(d)	Ratios presented are calculated under the transitional rules of the Basel Committee’s most recent capital framework (“Basel III”) and represent the Collins Floor. See Regulatory capital on pages 69–73 for additional information on Basel III.

(e)	Included held-to-maturity (“HTM”) securities of $50.2 billion, $51.6 billion, $49.3 billion, $49.3 billion, and $48.8 billion at September 30, 2015, June 30, 2015, March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and September 30, 2014, respectively.

(f)	Included unsecured long-term debt of $215.1 billion, $209.6 billion, $209.5 billion, $207.5 billion, and $204.7 billion at September 30, 2015, June 30, 2015, March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014, and September 30, 2014, respectively.

(g)	Excluded the impact of residential real estate PCI loans, a non-GAAP financial measure. For further discussion of these measures, see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 14–16. For further discussion, see Allowance for credit losses on pages 60–62.

---

---

(a)	Ratios presented are calculated under the transitional Basel III rules and represent the Collins Floor. See Regulatory capital on pages 69–73 for additional information on Basel III.

---

---

(a)	Included operating lease income of $536 million and $433 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.5 billion and $1.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

---

(a)	Included firmwide legal expense of $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $2.3 billion and $1.8 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively

(b)	Included Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-related (“FDIC”) expense of $298 million and $250 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $916 million and $809 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating TCE.

(a)	Interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable.

(b)	For a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis, see reconciliation from the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results to managed basis on page 14.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Predominantly consists of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value.

(b)	Included period-end credit card loans held-for-sale of $1.3 billion and $395 million at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating delinquency rates and the allowance for loan losses to period-end loans.

(c)	Equity is allocated to the sub-business segments with $5.0 billion and $3.0 billion of capital in 2015 and 2014, respectively, held at the CCB level related to legacy mortgage servicing matters.

(d)	Included average credit card loans held-for-sale of $1.3 billion and $335 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.9 billion and $352 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. These amounts are excluded when calculating the net charge-off rate.

---

(a)

Net charge-offs and the net charge-off rates excluded $52 million and $87 million of write-offs in the PCI portfolio for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $162 million and $196 million of write-offs in the PCI portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These write-offs decreased the allowance for loan losses for PCI loans. For further information on PCI write-offs, see Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 60–62.

(b)	Excludes PCI loans. The Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans as they are all performing.

(c)

At September 30, 2015 and 2014, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $6.6 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due; (2) student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) of $289 million and $354 million, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due; (3) real estate owned (“REO”) insured by U.S. government agencies of $327 million and $464 million, respectively. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee.

(d)	The allowance for loan losses for PCI loans was $2.8 billion and $3.7 billion at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively; these amounts were also excluded from the applicable ratios.

(e)	Users of all internet browsers and mobile platforms (mobile smartphone, tablet and SMS) who have logged in within the past 90 days.

---

---

(a)	Includes checking accounts and Chase Liquid® cards.

---

(a)	For further information on mortgage fees and related income, see Note 16.

---

(a)	Predominantly consists of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value.

---

(a)

Net charge-offs and the net charge-off rates excluded $52 million and $87 million of write-offs in the PCI portfolio for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $162 million and $196 million of write-offs in the PCI portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. These write-offs decreased the allowance for loan losses for PCI loans. For further information on PCI write-offs, see Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 60–62.

(b)	At September 30, 2015 and 2014, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $8.5 billion and $9.6 billion, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. For further discussion, see Note 13 which summarizes loan delinquency information.

(c)	The 30+ day delinquency rate for PCI loans was 11.29% and 13.69%, at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(d)	At September 30, 2015 and 2014, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $6.6 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due and (2) REO insured by U.S. government agencies of $327 million and $464 million, respectively. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee.

(e)	Excludes PCI loans. The Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans as they are all performing.

---

(a)	Firmwide mortgage origination volume was $32.2 billion and $22.7 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, respectively, and $90.5 billion and $58.9 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(b)	Represents the ratio of MSR carrying value (period-end) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) divided by the ratio of annualized loan servicing-related revenue to third-party mortgage loans serviced (average).

---

(a)	Included operating lease depreciation expense of $372 million and $293 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.0 billion and $851 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

---

---

(a)	Average credit card loans included loans held-for-sale of $1.3 billion and $335 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.9 billion and $352 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These amounts are excluded when calculating the net charge-off rate.

(b)	Period-end credit card loans included loans held-for-sale of $1.3 billion and $395 million at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating delinquency rates and the allowance for loan losses to period-end loans.

(c)	Excluded student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP of $507 million and $640 million at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee.

(d)	Nonperforming assets excluded student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP of $289 million and $354 million at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded from nonaccrual loans based upon the government guarantee.

---

(a)

Included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to income tax credits related to alternative energy investments; income tax credits and amortization of the cost of investments in affordable housing projects; as well as tax-exempt income from municipal bond investments of $417 million and $374 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(a)

Effective in the second quarter of 2015, Investment banking revenue (formerly Investment banking fees) incorporates all revenue associated with investment banking activities, and is reported net of investment banking revenue shared with other lines of business; previously such shared revenue had been reported in Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(b)	Effective in the second quarter of 2015, Trade Finance revenue was transferred from Treasury Services to Lending. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(c)	Consists primarily of credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”) managed by the credit portfolio group, and funding valuation adjustments (“FVA”) and debit valuation adjustments (“DVA”) on OTC derivatives and structured notes. Results are presented net of associated hedging activities and net of CVA and FVA amounts allocated to Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets.

---

---

(a)	Loans retained includes credit portfolio loans, trade finance loans, other held-for-investment loans and overdrafts.

(b)

Effective in the second quarter of 2015, certain technology staff were transferred from CIB to CB; previously-reported headcount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation. As the related expense for these staff is not material, prior period expenses have not been revised. Prior to the second quarter of 2015, compensation expense related to this headcount was recorded in the CIB, with an allocation to CB (reported in noncompensation expense); commencing with the second quarter of 2015, such expense is recorded as compensation expense in CB and accordingly total noninterest expense related to this headcount in both CB and CIB remains unchanged.

---

(a)	Loans retained includes credit portfolio loans, trade finance loans, other held-for-investment loans and overdrafts.

(b)	Allowance for loan losses of $160 million and $19 million were held against these nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(c)	Management uses allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained, excluding trade finance and conduits, a non-GAAP financial measure, to provide a more meaningful assessment of CIB’s allowance coverage ratio.

---

(a)	Source: Dealogic. Reflects the ranking of revenue wallet and market share

(b)	Long-term debt rankings include investment-grade, high-yield, supranationals, sovereigns, agencies, covered bonds, asset-backed securities (“ABS”) and mortgage-backed securities; and exclude money market, short-term debt, and U.S. municipal securities.

(c)	Global equity and equity-related rankings include rights offerings and Chinese A-Shares.

(d)	M&A and Announced M&A rankings reflect the removal of any withdrawn transactions. U.S. M&A revenue wallet represents wallet from client parents based in the U.S. U.S. announced M&A volumes represents any U.S. involvement ranking.

(e)	Global investment banking fees per Dealogic exclude money market, short-term debt and shelf deals.

(f)	Source: Dealogic. Reflects transaction volume and market share. Global announced M&A is based on transaction value at announcement; because of joint M&A assignments, M&A market share of all participants will add up to more than 100%. All other transaction volume-based rankings are based on proceeds, with full credit to each book manager/equal if joint.

(a)	Consists of mutual funds, unit investment trusts, currencies, annuities, insurance contracts, options and other contracts.

---

(a)	Total net revenue is based predominantly on the domicile of the client or location of the trading desk, as applicable. Loans outstanding (excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value), client deposits and other third-party liabilities, and AUC are based predominantly on the domicile of the client.

---

(a)	Includes revenue from investment banking products and commercial card transactions.

(b)

Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments from income tax credits related to equity investments in designated community development entities that provide loans to qualified businesses in low-income communities, as well as tax-exempt income from municipal bond activity of $116 million and $108 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $344 million and $317 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

---

(a)	Effective in the second quarter of 2015, Commercial Card and Chase Commerce Solutions/Paymentech product revenue was transferred from Lending and Other, respectively, to Treasury Services. Prior period amounts were revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(b)	Represents the total revenue from investment banking products sold to CB clients.

(c)	Effective in the first quarter of 2015, mortgage warehouse lending clients were transferred from Middle Market Banking to Corporate Client Banking. Prior period revenue, period-end loans, and average loans by client segment were revised to conform with the current period presentation.

---

(a)	Effective in the first quarter of 2015, mortgage warehouse lending clients were transferred from Middle Market Banking to Corporate Client Banking. Prior period revenue, period-end loans, and average loans by client segment were revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(b)

Effective in the second quarter of 2015, certain technology staff were transferred from CIB to CB; previously-reported headcount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation. As the related expense for these staff is not material, prior period expenses have not been revised. Prior to the second quarter of 2015, compensation expense related to this headcount was recorded in the CIB, with an allocation to CB (reported in noncompensation expense); commencing with the second quarter of 2015, such expense is recorded as compensation expense in CB and accordingly total noninterest expense related to this headcount in both CB and CIB remains unchanged.

---

(a)	Allowance for loan losses of $80 million and $71 million was held against nonaccrual loans retained at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(b)	Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the net charge-off/(recovery) rate.

---

---

(a)	Represents the “overall star rating” derived from Morningstar for the U.S., the U.K., Luxembourg, Hong Kong and Taiwan domiciled funds; and Nomura “star rating” for Japan domiciled funds. Includes only Global Investment Management retail open ended mutual funds that have a rating. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil and India domiciled funds.

(b)

Quartile ranking sourced from: Lipper for the U.S. and Taiwan domiciled funds; Morningstar for the U.K., Luxembourg and Hong Kong domiciled funds; Nomura for Japan domiciled funds and Fund Doctor for South Korea domiciled funds. Includes only Global Investment Management retail open ended mutual funds that are ranked by the aforementioned sources. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil and India domiciled funds.

(c)	Included $25.4 billion and $21.3 billion of prime mortgage loans reported in the Consumer, excluding credit card, loan portfolio at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For the same periods, excluded $2.2 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, of prime mortgage loans reported in the Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) portfolio within the Corporate segment.

---

(a)	Represents assets under management, as well as client balances in brokerage accounts.

---

---

(a)	Included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to tax-exempt income from municipal bond investments of $215 million and $190 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $620 million and $534 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(b)	Included legal expense of $102 million and $512 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $425 million and $737 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(c)	Effective with the first quarter of 2015, the Firm began including the results of Private Equity in the Other Corporate line within the Corporate segment. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. The Corporate segment’s balance sheets and results of operations were not impacted by this reporting change.

---

(a)	Average investment securities included held-to-maturity balances of $50.7 billion and $48.3 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $50.2 billion and $46.6 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(b)	Period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $50.2 billion and $48.8 billion at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(a)	For more information on the Firm’s methodologies regarding the valuation of the private equity portfolio, see Note 3 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report.

(b)	The sale of a portion of the Private Equity business was completed on January 9, 2015.

---

---

---

(a)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, excluded operating lease assets of $8.4 billion and $6.7 billion, respectively.

(b)

Credit card and home equity lending-related commitments represent the total available lines of credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit would be used at the same time. For credit card and home equity commitments (if certain conditions are met), the Firm can reduce or cancel these lines of credit by providing the borrower notice or, in some cases as permitted by law, without notice.

(c)	Receivables from customers represent margin loans to retail brokerage customers, and are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets.

(d)	Includes accrued interest and fees net of an allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued interest and fee income.

(e)	Predominantly represents prime mortgage loans held-for-sale.

---

(f)

At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, nonaccrual loans excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $6.6 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due; and (2) student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP of $289 million and $367 million, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded from nonaccrual loans based upon the government guarantee. In addition, credit card loans are generally exempt from being placed on nonaccrual status, as permitted by regulatory guidance.

(g)	Excludes PCI loans. The Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans as they are all performing.

(h)

Net charge-offs and the net charge-off rates excluded write-offs in the PCI portfolio of $52 million and $87 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $162 million and $196 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These write-offs decreased the allowance for loan losses for PCI loans. See Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 113–119 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report for further details.

(i)	Average consumer loans held-for-sale were $2.1 billion and $876 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $2.4 billion and $749 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating net charge-off rates.

---

---

(a)	Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated at least quarterly based on home valuation models that utilize nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates; such models incorporate actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available.

(b)	Represents current estimated combined LTV for junior home equity liens, which considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. All other products are presented without consideration of subordinate liens on the property.

(c)

Net carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition and is also net of the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, of $1.0 billion and $1.2 billion for prime mortgage, $49 million and $194 million for option ARMs, $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion for home equity, respectively, and $180 million for subprime mortgage at December 31, 2014. There was no allowance for loan losses for subprime mortgage at September 30, 2015.

(d)	The current period ratio has been updated to include the effect of any outstanding senior lien related to a property for which the Firm holds the junior home equity lien. The prior period ratio has been revised to conform with the current presentation.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Represents loans held-for-sale, primarily related to syndicated loans and loans transferred from the retained portfolio, and loans at fair value.

(b)	These derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP.

(c)	The notional amounts are presented on a net basis by underlying reference entity and the ratings profile shown is based on the ratings of the reference entity on which protection has been purchased.

(d)	Predominantly all of the credit derivatives entered into by the Firm where it has purchased protection, including Credit portfolio management derivatives, are executed with investment grade counterparties.

(e)	The maturity profile of retained loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables is based on the remaining contractual maturity. Derivative contracts that are in a receivable position at September 30, 2015, may become payable prior to maturity based on their cash flow profile or changes in market conditions.

---

---

(a)	The industry rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2014, are based on the industry rankings of the corresponding exposures at September 30, 2015, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2014.

(b)

In addition to the credit risk exposure to states and municipal governments (both U.S. and non-U.S.) at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, noted above, the Firm held: $7.1 billion and $10.6 billion, respectively, of trading securities; $32.7 billion and $30.1 billion, respectively, of available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities; and $12.7 billion and $10.2 billion, respectively, of HTM securities, issued by U.S. state and municipal governments. For further information, see Note 3 and Note 11.

(c)	All other includes: individuals, private education and civic organizations; SPEs; and holding companies, representing approximately 57%, 30% and 4%, respectively, at September 30, 2015, and 56%, 30% and 5%, respectively, at December 31, 2014.

(d)	Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of “Credit portfolio management derivatives net notional” held against derivative receivables or loans and “Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables”.

(e)	Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. The all other category includes purchased credit protection on certain credit indices.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Write-offs of PCI loans are recorded against the allowance for loan losses when actual losses for a pool exceed estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. A write-off of a PCI loan is recognized when the underlying loan is removed from a pool (e.g., upon liquidation).

(b)	Includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR. The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses modified in a TDR is calculated based on the loans’ original contractual interest rates and does not consider any incremental penalty rates.

(c)	The allowance for lending-related commitments is reported in other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets.

(d)	The Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance.

---

---

---

(a)	Average portfolio VaR and period-end portfolio VaR were less than the sum of the VaR of the components described above, due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect reflects the fact that the risks were not perfectly correlated.

(b)	Designated as not meaningful (“NM”), because the minimum and maximum may occur on different days for different risk components, and hence it is not meaningful to compute a portfolio-diversification effect.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	As the Tier 1 leverage ratio is not a risk-based measure of capital, the ratios are calculated in the same manner under both the Transitional and Fully Phased-In rules.

(b)	Effective January 1, 2015, Basel III Standardized RWA is calculated under the Basel III definition of the Standardized approach. Prior periods were based on Basel I with 2.5.

(c)	Represents the minimum capital ratios for 2015 currently applicable to the Firm under Basel III.

(d)	Represents the minimum capital ratios applicable to the Firm on a fully phased-in Basel III basis, including the final U.S. G-SIB surcharge estimated for the Firm by the Federal Reserve in its publication of the U.S. Final G-SIB Rule on July 20, 2015. These minimums will be fully phased-in effective January 1, 2019. For additional information on the G-SIB surcharge, see page 73.

(e)	In the case of SLR, the fully phased-in minimum ratio is effective beginning January 1, 2018.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Model & data changes refer to movements in levels of RWA as a result of revised methodologies and/or treatment per regulatory guidance (exclusive of rule changes).

(b)	Portfolio runoff for credit risk RWA reflects reduced risk from position rolloffs in legacy portfolios in Mortgage Banking (primarily under the Advanced framework) and Broker Dealer Services (primarily under the Standardized framework); and for market risk RWA reflects reduced risk from position rolloffs in legacy portfolios in the wholesale businesses.

(c)	Movement in portfolio levels for credit risk RWA refers to changes in book size, composition, credit quality, and market movements; and for market risk RWA refers to changes in position and market movements.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Included in beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets.

(b)	Excludes federal funds purchased.

(c)	Excluded long-term structured repurchase agreements of $4.0 billion and $2.7 billion as of September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, and average balance of $3.9 billion and $2.6 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $3.5 billion and $3.8 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(d)	Excluded average long-term securities loaned of $32 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. There was no balance for the other periods presented.

(e)	Other securitizations includes securitizations of residential mortgages and student loans. The Firm’s wholesale businesses also securitize loans for client-driven transactions; those client-driven loan securitizations are not considered to be a source of funding for the Firm and are not included in the table.

(f)	Includes long-term structured notes which are secured.

(g)	For additional information on preferred stock and common stockholders’ equity see Capital Management on pages 69–75 and the Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity on page 89; and Note 22 and Note 23 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report.

---

(a)	Other securitizations includes securitizations of residential mortgages and student loans.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	The Firm recognized other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses of $12 million and $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $14 million and $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

---

---

(a)	The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are consolidated by the Firm at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014. The difference between total VIE assets and liabilities represents the Firm’s interests in those entities, which were eliminated in consolidation.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations of $67.5 billion and $84.1 billion, respectively, which were predominantly mortgage-related.

(b)

At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included within trading loans were $13.1 billion and $17.0 billion, respectively, of residential first-lien mortgages, and $5.2 billion and $5.8 billion, respectively, of commercial first-lien mortgages. Residential mortgage loans include conforming mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell to U.S. government agencies of $6.0 billion and $7.7 billion, respectively, and reverse mortgages of $2.7 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively.

(c)

Physical commodities inventories are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or market. “Market” is a term defined in U.S. GAAP as not exceeding fair value less costs to sell (“transaction costs”). Transaction costs for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories are either not applicable or immaterial to the value of the inventory. Therefore, market approximates fair value for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories. When fair value hedging has been applied (or when market is below cost), the carrying value of physical commodities approximates fair value, because under fair value hedge accounting, the cost basis is adjusted for changes in fair value. For a further discussion of the Firm’s hedge accounting relationships, see Note 5. To provide consistent fair value disclosure information, all physical commodities inventories have been included in each period presented.

(d)	Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased (short positions).

(e)

As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. For purposes of the tables above, the Firm does not reduce derivative receivables and derivative payables balances for this netting adjustment, either within or across the levels of the fair value hierarchy, as such netting is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. However, if the Firm were to net such balances within level 3, the reduction in the level 3 derivative receivables and payables balances would be $1.8 billion and $2.5 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively; this is exclusive of the netting benefit associated with cash collateral, which would further reduce the level 3 balances.

(f)	Private equity instruments represent investments within the Corporate line of business. The cost basis of the private equity investment portfolio totaled $3.6 billion and $6.0 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

(g)	Certain prior period amounts (including the corresponding fair value parenthetical disclosure for accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets) were revised to conform with the current period presentation.

---

(a)	The categories presented in the table have been aggregated based upon the product type, which may differ from their classification on the Consolidated balance sheets.

(b)	The unobservable inputs and associated input ranges for approximately $394 million of credit derivative receivables and $355 million of credit derivative payables with underlying commercial mortgage risk have been included in the inputs and ranges provided for commercial mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and loans.

(c)	The unobservable inputs and associated input ranges for approximately $491 million of credit derivative receivables and $453 million of credit derivative payables with underlying asset-backed securities (“ABS”) risk have been included in the inputs and ranges provided for corporate debt securities, obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and other.

(d)

Long-term debt, other borrowed funds and deposits include structured notes issued by the Firm that are predominantly financial instruments containing embedded derivatives. The estimation of the fair value of structured notes is predominantly based on the derivative features embedded within the instruments. The significant unobservable inputs are broadly consistent with those presented for derivative receivables.

(e)	The parameters are related to residential mortgage-backed securities.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	All level 3 derivatives are presented on a net basis, irrespective of the underlying counterparty.

(b)	Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total Firm liabilities accounted for at fair value (including liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) was 13% at September 30, 2015 and 15% at December 31, 2014.

(c)	Predominantly reported in principal transactions revenue, except for changes in fair value for Consumer & Community Banking mortgage loans, lending-related commitments originated with the intent to sell, and mortgage loan purchase commitments, which are reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(d)

Realized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities, as well as other-than-temporary impairment losses that are recorded in earnings, are reported in securities gains. Unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in OCI. Realized gains/(losses) and foreign exchange hedge accounting adjustments recorded in income on AFS securities were zero and $(30) million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and $(7) million and $(43) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Unrealized gains/(losses) recorded on AFS securities in OCI were $(27) million and $(12) million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and $(27) million and $(13) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 respectively.

(e)	Changes in fair value for CCB mortgage servicing rights are reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(f)	Predominantly reported in other income.

(g)	Loan originations are included in purchases.

(h)	All transfers into and/or out of level 3 are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarterly reporting period in which they occur.

(i)	The prior period amounts have been revised. The revision had no impact on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets or its results of operations.

---

---

(a)	Carrying value includes unamortized discount or premium.

(b)

Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the characteristics of the underlying loans (including principal, contractual interest rate and contractual fees) and other key inputs, including expected lifetime credit losses, interest rates, prepayment rates, and primary origination or secondary market spreads. For certain loans, the fair value is measured based on the value of the underlying collateral. The difference between the estimated fair value and carrying value of a financial asset or liability is the result of the different methodologies used to determine fair value as compared with carrying value. For example, credit losses are estimated for a financial asset’s remaining life in a fair value calculation but are estimated for a loss emergence period in the allowance for loan loss calculation; future loan income (interest and fees) is incorporated in a fair value calculation but is generally not considered in the allowance for loan losses. For a further discussion of the Firm’s methodologies for estimating the fair value of loans and lending-related commitments, see Valuation hierarchy on pages 181–184 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report.

(c)	Certain prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation.

(d)	Carrying value includes unamortized original issue discount and other valuation adjustments.

---

(a)	Represents the allowance for wholesale lending-related commitments. Excludes the current carrying values of the guarantee liability and the offsetting asset, each of which are recognized at fair value at the inception of guarantees.

---

(a)

Total changes in instrument-specific credit risk (DVA) related to structured notes were $169 million and $190 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $492 million and $209 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These totals include such changes for structured notes classified within deposits and other borrowed funds, as well as long-term debt.

(b)	Structured notes are predominantly financial instruments containing embedded derivatives. Where present, the embedded derivative is the primary driver of risk. Although the risk associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains/(losses) reported in this table do not include the income statement impact of the risk management instruments used to manage such risk.

(c)	Reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(d)	Reported in other income.

---

(a)	There were no performing loans that were ninety days or more past due as of September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

(b)

Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected notes. Unlike principal-protected structured notes, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of principal at the maturity of the note, nonprincipal-protected structured notes do not obligate the Firm to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but to return an amount based on the performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note. However, investors are exposed to the credit risk of the Firm as issuer for both nonprincipal-protected and principal protected notes.

(c)	Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance reflects the contractual principal payment at maturity or, if applicable, the contractual principal payment at the Firm’s next call date.

---

---

---

(a)	Balances exclude structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected. See Note 4 for further information.

(b)	As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral receivables and payables when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists.

---

(a)	Exchange-traded derivative amounts that relate to futures contracts are settled daily.

(b)	Included cash collateral netted of $74.3 billion and $74.0 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

---

(a)	Exchange-traded derivative balances that relate to futures contracts are settled daily.

(b)	Included cash collateral netted of $68.2 billion and $64.2 billion related to OTC and OTC-cleared derivatives at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

---

(a)	Represents liquid security collateral as well as cash collateral held at third party custodians. For some counterparties, the collateral amounts of financial instruments may exceed the derivative receivables and derivative payables balances. Where this is the case, the total amount reported is limited to the net derivative receivables and net derivative payables balances with that counterparty.

(b)	Derivative payables collateral relates only to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative instruments. Amounts exclude collateral transferred related to exchange-traded derivative instruments.

(c)	Net amount represents exposure of counterparties to the Firm.

---

(a)	Includes the additional collateral to be posted for initial margin.

(b)	Amounts represent fair values of derivative payables, and do not reflect collateral posted.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of hedges of the benchmark (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) interest rate risk of fixed-rate long-term debt and AFS securities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income.

(b)	Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of long-term debt and AFS securities for changes in spot foreign currency rates. Gains and losses related to the derivatives and the hedged items, due to changes in foreign currency rates, were recorded in principal transactions revenue and net interest income.

(c)	Consists of overall fair value hedges of physical commodities inventories that are generally carried at the lower of cost or market (market approximates fair value). Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.

(d)	Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument does not exactly offset the gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

(e)	The assessment of hedge effectiveness excludes certain components of the changes in fair values of the derivatives and hedged items such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts and time values.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of benchmark interest rate hedges of LIBOR-indexed floating-rate assets and floating-rate liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income, and for forecasted transactions that the Firm determined during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, were probable of not occurring, in other income.

(b)	Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and expense. The income statement classification of gains and losses follows the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue and compensation expense.

(c)	Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the cumulative gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument exceeds the present value of the cumulative expected change in cash flows on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

---

(a)

Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. Amounts related to excluded components are recorded in other income. The Firm measures the ineffectiveness of net investment hedge accounting relationships based on changes in spot foreign currency rates, and therefore there was no significant ineffectiveness for net investment hedge accounting relationships during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

---

(a)	Other credit derivatives predominantly consists of credit swap options.

(b)	Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference instrument is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold.

(c)	Does not take into account the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement, which would generally reduce the amount the seller of protection pays to the buyer of protection in determining settlement value.

(d)	Represents protection purchased by the Firm on referenced instruments (single-name, portfolio or index) where the Firm has not sold any protection on the identical reference instrument.

---

(a)	The ratings scale is primarily based on external credit ratings defined by S&P and Moody’s Investors Service ("Moody's").

(b)	Amounts are shown on a gross basis, before the benefit of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral received by the Firm.

---

---

(a)	Represents securities which are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

(b)	Negative interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, is a result of increased client-driven demand for certain securities combined with the impact of low interest rates. This is matched book activity and the negative interest expense on the corresponding securities loaned is recognized in interest expense and reported within short-term and other liabilities.

(c)	Largely margin loans.

(d)	Includes brokerage customer payables.

---

(a)	Includes various defined benefit pension plans which are individually immaterial.

---

---

(a)	Included total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations with fair values of $41.6 billion and $59.3 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

(b)

As of September 30, 2015, consists of MBS issued by U. S. government-sponsored enterprises with an amortized cost of $31.9 billion, MBS issued by U.S. government agencies with an amortized cost of $5.6 billion and obligations of U.S. states and municipalities with an amortized cost of $12.7 billion. As of December 31, 2014, consists of MBS issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises with an amortized cost of $35.3 billion, MBS issued by U.S. government agencies with an amortized cost of $3.7 billion and obligations of U.S. states and municipalities with an amortized cost of $10.2 billion.

---

---

---

(a)	U.S. government-sponsored enterprises were the only issuers whose securities exceeded 10% of JPMorgan Chase’s total stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2015.

(b)

Average yield is computed using the effective yield of each security owned at the end of the period, weighted based on the amortized cost of each security. The effective yield considers the contractual coupon, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. The effective yield excludes unscheduled principal prepayments, and accordingly, actual maturities of securities may differ from their contractual or expected maturities as certain securities may be prepaid.

(c)

Includes securities with no stated maturity. Substantially all of the Firm’s residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are due in ten years or more, based on contractual maturity. The estimated weighted-average life, which reflects anticipated future prepayments, is approximately six years for agency residential mortgage-backed securities, two years for agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations and three years for U.S. nonagency residential collateralized mortgage obligations.

---

(a)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included securities purchased under resale agreements of $27.4 billion and $28.6 billion, respectively, accounted for at fair value.

(b)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included securities borrowed of $405 million and $992 million, respectively, accounted for at fair value.

(c)	Included $21.5 billion and $27.7 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, of securities borrowed where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained with respect to the master netting agreement.

---

(a)

For some counterparties, the sum of the financial instruments and cash collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets may exceed the net asset balance. Where this is the case the total amounts reported in these two columns are limited to the balance of the net reverse repurchase agreement or securities borrowed asset with that counterparty. As a result a net exposure amount is reported even though the Firm, on an aggregate basis for its securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed, has received securities collateral with a total fair value that is greater than the funds provided to counterparties.

(b)	Includes financial instrument collateral received, repurchase liabilities and securities loaned liabilities with an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the master netting agreement; these amounts are not presented net on the Consolidated balance sheets because other U.S. GAAP netting criteria are not met.

(a)	Includes repurchase agreements that are not subject to a master netting agreement but do provide rights to collateral.

(b)	Included securities-for-securities lending transactions of $5.8 billion and $4.1 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, accounted for at fair value, where the Firm is acting as lender. These amounts are presented within other liabilities in the Consolidated balance sheets.

(c)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included securities sold under repurchase agreements of $3.6 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, accounted for at fair value.

(d)	There were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value as of September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014.

(e)	Included $41 million and $271 million at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, of securities loaned where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained with respect to the master netting agreement.

---

(a)	For some counterparties the sum of the financial instruments and cash collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets may exceed the net liability balance. Where this is the case the total amounts reported in these two columns are limited to the balance of the net repurchase agreement or securities loaned liability with that counterparty.

(b)	Includes financial instrument collateral transferred, reverse repurchase assets and securities borrowed assets with an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the master netting agreement; these amounts are not presented net on the Consolidated balance sheets because other U.S. GAAP netting criteria are not met.

(c)	Net amount represents exposure of counterparties to the Firm.

---

(a)	Includes loans held in CCB, prime mortgage and home equity loans held in AM and prime mortgage loans held in Corporate.

(b)	Includes certain business banking and auto dealer risk-rated loans that apply the wholesale methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses; these loans are managed by CCB, and therefore, for consistency in presentation, are included with the other consumer loan classes.

(c)	Includes loans held in CIB, CB, AM and Corporate. Excludes prime mortgage and home equity loans held in AM and prime mortgage loans held in Corporate. Classes are internally defined and may not align with regulatory definitions.

(d)	Other primarily includes loans to SPEs and loans to private banking clients. See Note 1 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report for additional information on special-purpose entities (“SPEs”).

---

(a)	Includes billed finance charges and fees net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts.

(b)	Loans (other than PCI loans and those for which the fair value option has been elected) are presented net of unearned income, unamortized discounts and premiums, and net deferred loan costs of $628 million and $1.3 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

(a)

Purchases predominantly represent the Firm’s voluntary repurchase of certain delinquent loans from loan pools as permitted by Ginnie Mae guidelines. The Firm typically elects to repurchase these delinquent loans as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with applicable requirements of Ginnie Mae, the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), Rural Housing Services (“RHS”) and/or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”).

(b)	Excluded retained loans purchased from correspondents that were originated in accordance with the Firm’s underwriting standards. Such purchases were $14.4 billion and $4.1 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $39.8 billion and $8.2 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(a)	Excludes sales related to loans accounted for at fair value.

---

---

(a)	Individual delinquency classifications include mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies as follows: current included $2.7 billion and $2.6 billion; 30–149 days past due included $3.0 billion and $3.5 billion; and 150 or more days past due included $5.3 billion and $6.0 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

(b)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, Prime, including option ARMs loans excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $8.3 billion and $9.5 billion, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from nonaccrual loans based upon the government guarantee.

(c)

These balances, which are 90 days or more past due, were excluded from nonaccrual loans as the loans are guaranteed by U.S government agencies. Typically, the principal balance of the loans is insured and interest is guaranteed at a specified reimbursement rate subject to meeting agreed-upon servicing guidelines. At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, these balances included $3.8 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively, of loans that are no longer accruing interest based on the agreed-upon servicing guidelines. For the remaining balance, interest is being accrued at the guaranteed reimbursement rate. There were no loans not guaranteed by U.S. government agencies that are 90 or more days past due and still accruing at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014.

(d)

Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates.

(e)	Junior lien represents combined loan-to-value (“LTV”), which considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. All other products are presented without consideration of subordinate liens on the property.

(f)	Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis.

(g)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $11.0 billion and $12.1 billion, respectively.

---

(a)

Represents collateral-dependent residential mortgage loans that are charged off to the fair value of the underlying collateral less cost to sell. The Firm reports, in accordance with regulatory guidance, residential real estate loans that have been discharged under Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower (“Chapter 7 loans”) as collateral-dependent nonaccrual TDRs, regardless of their delinquency status. At September 30, 2015, Chapter 7 residential real estate loans included approximately 18% of senior lien home equity, 10% of junior lien home equity, 19% of prime mortgages, including option ARMs, and 14% of subprime mortgages that were 30 days or more past due.

(b)

At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, $4.2 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively, of loans modified subsequent to repurchase from Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) in accordance with the standards of the appropriate government agency (i.e., FHA, VA, RHS) are not included in the table above. When such loans perform subsequent to modification in accordance with Ginnie Mae guidelines, they are generally sold back into Ginnie Mae loan pools. Modified loans that do not re-perform become subject to foreclosure.

(c)	Predominantly all residential real estate impaired loans, excluding PCI loans, are in the U.S.

(d)	Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs, net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discounts or premiums on purchased loans.

(e)	As of September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, nonaccrual loans included $2.6 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, of TDRs for which the borrowers were less than 90 days past due. For additional information about loans modified in a TDR that are on nonaccrual status refer to the Loan accounting framework in Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report.

---

(a)	Generally, interest income on loans modified in TDRs is recognized on a cash basis until such time as the borrower has made a minimum of six payments under the new terms.

---

(a)	Represents concessions granted in permanent modifications as a percentage of the number of loans permanently modified. The sum of the percentages exceeds 100% because predominantly all of the modifications include more than one type of concession. A significant portion of trial modifications include interest rate reductions and/or term or payment extensions.

(b)	Represents variable interest rate to fixed interest rate modifications.

---

(a)

Represents loans permanently modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The dollar amounts presented represent the balance of such loans at the end of the reporting period in which such loans defaulted. For residential real estate loans modified in TDRs, payment default is deemed to occur when the loan becomes two contractual payments past due. In the event that a modified loan redefaults, it is probable that the loan will ultimately be liquidated through foreclosure or another similar type of liquidation transaction. Redefaults of loans modified within the last 12 months may not be representative of ultimate redefault levels.

---

(a)	Individual delinquency classifications included loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”)

(b)	These amounts represent student loans, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP. These amounts were accruing as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally.

(c)	For risk-rated business banking and auto loans, the primary credit quality indicator is the risk rating of the loan, including whether the loans are considered to be criticized and/or nonaccrual.

(d)	September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, excluded loans 30 days or more past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP, of $507 million and $654 million, respectively. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally.

---

---

(a)	Carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition.

(b)	Management concluded as part of the Firm’s regular assessment of the PCI loan pools that it was probable that higher expected credit losses would result in a decrease in expected cash flows. As a result, an allowance for loan losses for impairment of these pools has been recognized.

(c)

Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property.

(d)	Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis.

---

---

---

(a)	The U.S. and non-U.S. distribution is determined based predominantly on the domicile of the borrower.

(b)	The credit quality of wholesale loans is assessed primarily through ongoing review and monitoring of an obligor’s ability to meet contractual obligations rather than relying on the past due status, which is generally a lagging indicator of credit quality. For a discussion of more significant risk factors, see Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report.

(c)	Represents loans that are considered well-collateralized and therefore still accruing interest.

(d)	Other primarily includes loans to SPEs and loans to private banking clients. See Note 1 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2014 Annual Report for additional information on SPEs.

---

(a)	When the discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the recorded investment in the loan, the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs when the impaired loans have been partially charged-off and/or there have been interest payments received and applied to the loan balance.

(b)	Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs; interest payments received and applied to the carrying value; net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discount or premiums on purchased loans.

(c)	Based upon the domicile of the borrower, predominantly all wholesale impaired loans are in the U.S.

---

(a)	Write-offs of PCI loans are recorded against the allowance for loan losses when actual losses for a pool exceed estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. A write-off of a PCI loan is recognized when the underlying loan is removed from a pool (e.g., upon liquidation).

(b)	Includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR.

(c)	The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses is related to loans that have been modified in a TDR; such allowance is calculated based on the loans’ original contractual interest rates and does not consider any incremental penalty rates.

---

---

(a)	Excludes U.S. government agency securitizations. See page 151 of this Note for information on the Firm’s loan sales to U.S. government agencies.

(b)	Consists of securities backed by commercial loans (predominantly real estate) and non-mortgage-related consumer receivables purchased from third parties. The Firm generally does not retain a residual interest in its sponsored commercial mortgage securitization transactions.

(c)

The table above excludes the following: retained servicing (see Note 16 for a discussion of MSRs); securities retained from loan sales to U.S. government agencies; interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives primarily used to manage interest rate and foreign exchange risks of securitization entities (See Note 5 for further information on derivatives); senior and subordinated securities of $132 million and $64 million, respectively, at September 30, 2015, and $136 million and $34 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014, which the Firm purchased in connection with CIB’s secondary market-making activities.

(d)	Includes interests held in re-securitization transactions.

(e)

As of September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, 76% and 77%, respectively, of the Firm’s retained securitization interests, which are carried at fair value, were risk-rated “A” or better, on an S&P-equivalent basis. The retained interests in prime residential mortgages consisted of $2.1 billion and $1.1 billion of investment-grade and $115 million and $185 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively. The retained interests in commercial and other securitizations trusts consisted of $3.8 billion and $3.7 billion of investment-grade and $239 million and $194 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

---

---

(a)	Includes municipal bond VIEs sponsored by third parties, but where the Firm provides the liquidity facility and serves as the remarketing agent.

(b)	Represents the excess/(deficit) of the fair values of municipal bond assets available to repay the liquidity facilities, if drawn.

(c)	The ratings scale is presented on an S&P-equivalent basis.

---

(a)	Excludes intercompany transactions which were eliminated in consolidation.

(b)	Includes residential and commercial mortgage securitizations as well as re-securitizations.

(c)	Includes assets classified as cash, AFS securities, and other assets within the Consolidated balance sheets.

(d)	The assets of the consolidated VIEs included in the program types above are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The difference between total assets and total liabilities recognized for consolidated VIEs represents the Firm’s interest in the consolidated VIEs for each program type.

(e)

The interest-bearing beneficial interest liabilities issued by consolidated VIEs are classified in the line item on the Consolidated balance sheets titled, “Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities.” The holders of these beneficial interests do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. Included in beneficial interests in VIE assets are long-term beneficial interests of $33.2 billion and $35.4 billion at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively. The maturities of the long-term beneficial interests as of September 30, 2015, were as follows: $5.0 billion under one year, $23.8 billion between one and five years, and $4.4 billion over five years.

(f)	Includes liabilities classified as accounts payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated balance sheets.

---

(a)	Excludes re-securitization transactions.

(b)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, $913 million and $2.6 billion, respectively, of proceeds from residential mortgage securitizations were received as securities classified in level 2 and $59 million of proceeds classified as level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, $3.0 billion and $9.0 billion, respectively, of proceeds from commercial mortgage securitizations were received as securities classified in level 2 and $5 million and $43 million, respectively, of proceeds classified as level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, $484 million and $1.1 billion of proceeds from residential mortgage securitizations were received as securities classified in level 2 and zero and $21 million of proceeds classified as level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, $3.1 billion and $7.4 billion, respectively, of proceeds from commercial mortgage securitizations were received as securities classified in level 2 and zero and $130 million of proceeds classified as level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and zero and $280 million of proceeds from commercial mortgage securitization were received as cash. All loans transferred into securitization vehicles during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, were classified as trading assets; changes in fair value were recorded in principal transactions revenue, and there were no significant gains or losses associated with the securitization activity.

(c)	Includes cash paid by the Firm to reacquire assets from off–balance sheet, nonconsolidated entities – for example, loan repurchases due to representation and warranties and servicer clean-up calls.

(d)	Includes prime, Alt-A, subprime, and option ARMs. Excludes certain loan securitization transactions entered into with Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

(e)	Includes commercial and student loan securitizations.

---

(a)

Total assets held in securitization-related SPEs were $239.5 billion and $254.3 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014. The $184.4 billion and $198.4 billion, respectively, of loans securitized at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, excluded: $53.3 billion and $52.2 billion, respectively, of securitized loans in which the Firm has no continuing involvement, and $1.8 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, of loan securitizations consolidated on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014.

(b)	Includes securitized loans that were previously recorded at fair value and classified as trading assets.

---

---

(a)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, predominantly represents excess MSRs transferred to agency-sponsored trusts in exchange for stripped mortgage-backed securities (“SMBS”). In each transaction, a portion of the SMBS was acquired by third parties at the transaction date; the Firm acquired and has retained the remaining balance of those SMBS as trading securities. Also includes sales of MSRs for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

(b)	Included changes related to commercial real estate of $(1) million and $(1) million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $(3) million and $(5) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(c)	Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.

(d)	Represents changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates.

(e)	Included $7 million and $13 million related to commercial real estate at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(f)

Represents amounts the Firm pays as the servicer (e.g., scheduled principal and interest, taxes and insurance), which will generally be reimbursed within a short period of time after the advance from future cash flows from the trust or the underlying loans. The Firm’s credit risk associated with these servicer advances is minimal because reimbursement of the advances is typically senior to all cash payments to investors. In addition, the Firm maintains the right to stop payment to investors if the collateral is insufficient to cover the advance. However, certain of these servicer advances may not be recoverable if they were not made in accordance with applicable rules and agreements.

(g)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the decrease was primarily related to higher capital allocated to the Mortgage Servicing business, which, in turn, resulted in an increase in the option adjusted spread (“OAS”). The resulting OAS assumption continues to be consistent with capital and return requirements that the Firm believes a market participant would consider, taking into account factors such as the current operating risk environment and regulatory and economic capital requirements.

---

(a)	Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.

(b)	Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service), discount rates and changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates (e.g., changes in prepayments due to changes in home prices).

---

---

(a)	Represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of securities accounted for as AFS; including, as of the date of transfer during the first quarter of 2014, $9 million of net unrealized losses related to AFS securities that were transferred to HTM. Subsequent to transfer, includes any net unamortized unrealized gains and losses related to the transferred securities.

---

(a)	The pretax amount is reported in securities gains in the Consolidated statements of income.

(b)	Reclassifications of pretax realized gains/(losses) on translation adjustments and related hedges are reported in other income/expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The amounts were not material for the periods presented.

(c)	The pretax amounts are predominantly recorded in net interest income in the Consolidated statements of income.

(d)	The pretax amount is reported in compensation expense in the Consolidated statements of income.

(e)	In the first quarter of 2015, the Firm reclassified approximately $150 million of net losses from AOCI to other income because the Firm determined that it is probable that the forecasted interest payment cash flows will not occur. For additional information, see Note 5.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Includes certain commitments to purchase loans from correspondents.

(b)	Predominantly all consumer lending-related commitments are in the U.S.

(c)

At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, reflects the contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $321 million and $243 million, respectively, for other unfunded commitments to extend credit; $11.7 billion and $13.0 billion, respectively, for standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $409 million and $469 million, respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve these commitments are shown gross of risk participations.

(d)

At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included credit enhancements and bond and commercial paper liquidity commitments to U.S. states and municipalities, hospitals and other non-profit entities of $13.0 billion and $14.8 billion, respectively, within other unfunded commitments to extend credit; and $10.0 billion and $13.3 billion, respectively, within standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees. Other unfunded commitments to extend credit also include liquidity facilities to nonconsolidated municipal bond VIEs; for further information, see Note 15.

(e)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included commitments that could be utilized for standby letters of credit commitments of $45.1 billion and $45.6 billion, respectively.

(f)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the U.S. portion of the contractual amount of total wholesale lending-related commitments was 77% and 73%, respectively.

(g)

Effective January 1, 2015, the Firm no longer includes within its disclosure of wholesale lending-related commitments the unused amount of advised uncommitted lines of credit as it is within the Firm’s discretion whether or not to make a loan under these lines, and the Firm’s approval is generally required prior to funding. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(h)	At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, collateral held by the Firm in support of securities lending indemnification agreements was $190.3 billion and $177.1 billion, respectively. Securities lending collateral comprises primarily cash and securities issued by governments that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) and U.S. government agencies.

(i)

At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included unfunded commitments of $57 million and $147 million, respectively, to third-party private equity funds; and $1.4 billion and $961 million, at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, to other equity investments. These commitments included $53 million and $150 million, respectively, related to investments that are generally fair valued at net asset value as discussed in Note 3. In addition, at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, included letters of credit hedged by derivative transactions and managed on a market risk basis of $4.6 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively.

(j)	For lending-related products, the carrying value represents the allowance for lending-related commitments and the guarantee liability; for derivative-related products, the carrying value represents the fair value.

---

(a)	The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal ratings which generally correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications that do not have any impact on net income as reported by the lines of business or by the Firm as a whole.

(b)	Segment managed results reflect revenue on an FTE basis with the corresponding income tax impact recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These FTE adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results.

---

---

(a)	Represents securities which are tax exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

(b)	Includes margin loans.

(c)	Includes brokerage customer payables.

(d)	Interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable.

(e)	Negative interest income and yield is a result of increased client-driven demand for certain securities combined with the impact of low interest rates; this is matched book activity and the negative interest expense on the corresponding securities loaned is recognized in interest expense and reported within trading liabilities – debt, short-term and other liabilities.

(f)	For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the annualized rates for securities, based on amortized cost, were 2.90% and 2.79%, respectively; this does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss).

(g)	Included trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments of $78,439 million and $85,407 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

---

(a)	Represents securities which are tax exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

(b)	Includes margin loans.

(c)	Includes brokerage customer payables.

(d)	Interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable.

(e)	Negative interest income and yield is a result of increased client-driven demand for certain securities combined with the impact of low interest rates; this is matched book activity and the negative interest expense on the corresponding securities loaned is recognized in interest expense and reported within trading liabilities – debt, short-term and other liabilities.

(f)	For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the annualized rates for securities, based on amortized cost, were 2.87% and 2.82% and respectively; this does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss).

(g)	Included trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments of $81,913 million and $85,289 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	The unused portion under the prior Board authorization was canceled when the $6.4 billion program was authorized. Repurchases during the second quarter included $29 million under the prior program.

(b)	Excludes commissions cost.

(c)	Dollar value remaining under the new $6.4 billion program.

---

---

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JPMorgan Chase & Co.