---

---

(a)	The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. The revision had no impact on the Firm’s reported earnings per share.

(b)	Share prices are from the New York Stock Exchange.

(c)	TBVPS and ROTCE are non-GAAP financial measures. For further discussion of these measures, see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Financial Performance Measures on pages 13–15.

(d)	HQLA represents the amount of assets that qualify for inclusion in the liquidity coverage ratio. For additional information, see HQLA on page 57.

(e)	Ratios presented are calculated under the Basel III Transitional capital rules and for the capital ratios represent the Collins Floor. See Capital Risk Management on pages 32–39 for additional information on Basel III.

(f)	Included unsecured long-term debt of $212.0 billion, $212.6 billion, $226.8 billion, $220.6 billion and $216.1 billion at March 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

(g)	Excluded the impact of residential real estate purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans, a non-GAAP financial measure. For further discussion of these measures, see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Measures on pages 13–15. For further discussion, see Allowance for credit losses on pages 53–55.

(h)	For the first quarter of 2017, excluding net charge-offs of $467 million related to the student loan portfolio write-down, the net charge-off rate would have been 0.54%. For additional information, refer to CCB segment results on page 17.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating TCE.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	The Tier 1 leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by adjusted average assets.

(b)	The SLR leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by total leverage exposure. For additional information on total leverage exposure , see SLR on page 37.

(c)

Represents the Transitional minimum capital ratios applicable to the Firm under Basel III as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, the CET1 minimum capital ratio includes 1.25% resulting from the phase in of the Firm’s 2.5% capital conservation buffer and 1.75%, resulting from the phase-in of the Firm’s 3.5% global systemically important banks (“GSIB”) surcharge. At December 31, 2016, the CET1 minimum capital ratio includes 0.625% resulting from the phase-in of the Firm’s 2.5% capital conservation buffer and 1.125%, resulting from the phase-in of the Firm’s 4.5% GSIB surcharge. For additional information on the GSIB surcharge, see pages 34-35.

(d)	Represents the minimum capital ratios applicable to the Firm on a Fully Phased-In Basel III basis. At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the ratios include the Firm’s estimate of its Fully Phased-In U.S. GSIB surcharge of 3.5%. The minimum capital ratios will be fully phased-in effective January 1, 2019. For additional information on the GSIB surcharge, see pages 34-35.

(e)	In the case of the SLR, the Fully Phased-In minimum ratio is effective beginning January 1, 2018.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Model & data changes refer to movements in levels of RWA as a result of revised methodologies and/or treatment per regulatory guidance (exclusive of rule changes).

(b)	Portfolio runoff for credit risk RWA primarily reflects reduced risk from position rolloffs in legacy portfolios in Mortgage Banking (under both the Standardized and Advanced framework); and for market risk RWA reflects reduced risk from position rolloffs in legacy portfolios in the wholesale businesses.

(c)	Movement in portfolio levels for credit risk RWA refers to changes in book size, composition, credit quality, and market movements; and for market risk RWA refers to changes in position and market movements.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Certain loan portfolios have been reclassified. The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(b)	At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, excluded operating lease assets of $14.3 billion and $13.2 billion, respectively.

(c)	Predominantly includes Business Banking loans.

(d)

For the first quarter of 2017, excluding net charge-offs of $467 million related to the student loan portfolio write-down, the net charge-off rate for Total consumer, excluding credit card and PCI loans and loans held-for-sale would have been 0.27%; Total consumer– retained excluding credit card loans would have been 0.24%; Total consumer credit portfolio would have been 0.98%; and Total consumer credit portfolio, excluding PCI loans would have been 1.05%.

(e)	At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, approximately 67% and 66%, respectively, of the PCI option adjustable rate mortgage (“ARM”) portfolio has been modified into fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans.

(f)

Credit card and home equity lending-related commitments represent the total available lines of credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit would be used at the same time. For credit card and home equity commitments (if certain conditions are met), the Firm can reduce or cancel these lines of credit by providing the borrower notice or, in some cases as permitted by law, without notice.

(g)	Receivables from customers represent margin loans to brokerage customers that are collateralized through assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts, as such no allowance is held against these receivables. These receivables are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets.

(h)	Includes billed interest and fees net of an allowance for uncollectible interest and fees.

(i)	Predominantly represents student loans held-for-sale.

(j)

At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, nonaccrual loans excluded loans 90 or more days past due as follows: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $4.5 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively; and (2) student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP of $234 million and $263 million, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from nonaccrual loans based upon the government guarantee. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status, as permitted by regulatory guidance issued by the FFIEC.

(k)	Excludes PCI loans. The Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans as they are all performing.

(l)	Net charge-offs and the net charge-off rates excluded write-offs in the PCI portfolio of $24 million and $47 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These write-offs decreased the allowance for loan losses for PCI loans. See Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 53–55 for further details.

(m)	Average consumer loans held-for-sale were $302 million and $425 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating net charge-off rates.

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Represents loans held-for-sale, primarily related to syndicated loans and loans transferred from the retained portfolio, and loans at fair value.

(b)	These derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP.

(c)

The notional amounts are presented on a net basis by underlying reference entity and the ratings profile shown is based on the ratings of the reference entity on which protection has been purchased. Predominantly all of the credit derivatives entered into by the Firm where it has purchased protection, including credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities, are executed with investment-grade counterparties.

(d)	The maturity profile of retained loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables is based on the remaining contractual maturity. Derivative contracts that are in a receivable position at March 31, 2017, may become payable prior to maturity based on their cash flow profile or changes in market conditions.

---

---

(a)	The industry rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2016, are based on the industry rankings of the corresponding exposures at March 31, 2017, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2016.

(b)

In addition to the credit risk exposure to states and municipal governments (both U.S. and non-U.S.) at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, noted above, the Firm held: $8.2 billion and $9.1 billion, respectively, of trading securities; $32.2 billion and $31.6 billion, respectively, of AFS securities; and $14.5 billion of HTM securities for both periods, issued by U.S. state and municipal governments. For further information, see Note 2 and Note 10.

(c)	All other includes: individuals; SPEs; and private education and civic organizations; representing approximately 59%, 37%, and 4%, respectively, at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

(d)	Excludes cash placed with banks of $451.9 billion and $380.2 billion, at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, which is predominantly placed with various central banks, primarily Federal Reserve Banks.

(e)	Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities held against derivative receivables or loans and liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables.

(f)	Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. The All other category includes purchased credit protection on certain credit indices.

---

(a)	Noninvestment-grade exposure to E&P and Oilfield Services is largely secured.

(b)	Other Oil & Gas includes Integrated Oil & Gas companies, Midstream/Oil Pipeline companies and refineries.

(c)	Natural Gas Pipelines is reported within the Utilities industry.

(d)	Represents drawn exposure as a percentage of credit exposure.

---

---

---

---

(a)

For the first quarter of 2017, excluding net charge-offs of $467 million related to the student loan portfolio write-down, the net charge-off rate for Consumer, excluding credit card would have been 0.24%; total Firm would have been 0.54%; Consumer, excluding credit card and PCI loans would have been 0.27%; and total Firm, excluding PCI would have been 0.57%. For additional information refer to CCB segment results on page 17.

(b)	Write-offs of PCI loans are recorded against the allowance for loan losses when actual losses for a pool exceed estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. A write-off of a PCI loan is recognized when the underlying loan is removed from a pool (e.g., upon liquidation).

(c)	Includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR. The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses modified in a TDR is calculated based on the loans’ original contractual interest rates and does not consider any incremental penalty rates.

(d)	The allowance for lending-related commitments is reported in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets.

(e)	The Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Included in beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets.

(b)	Excluded long-term structured repurchase agreements of $2.2 billion and $1.8 billion as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, and average balances of $1.5 billion and $4.4 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(c)	Excludes long-term securities loaned of $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, and average balances of $1.3 billion for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.

(d)	The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(e)	Excludes federal funds purchased.

(f)	Other securitizations include securitizations of student loans. The Firm’s wholesale businesses also securitize loans for client-driven transactions, which are not considered to be a source of funding for the Firm and are not included in the table.

(g)	Includes long-term structured notes which are secured.

(h)	For additional information on preferred stock and common stockholders’ equity see Capital Risk Management on pages 32–39 and the Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity on page 76; and Note 22 and Note 23 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2016 Annual Report.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Average portfolio VaR and period-end portfolio VaR were less than the sum of the VaR of the components described above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect reflects the fact that the risks are not perfectly correlated.

(b)	Designated as NM, because the minimum and maximum may occur on different days for different risk components, and hence it is not meaningful to compute a portfolio-diversification effect.

---

---

---

(a)	Impact recognized through OCI.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Early adoption is permitted.

(b)	Early adoption is permitted on January 1, 2019.

---

---

(a)	The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. The revision had no impact on the Firm’s reported earnings per share.

---

---

(a)	The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are consolidated by the Firm at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016. The difference between total VIE assets and liabilities represents the Firm’s interests in those entities, which are eliminated in consolidation.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, included total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations of $77.2 billion and $80.6 billion, respectively, which were predominantly mortgage-related.

(b)

At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, included within trading loans were $12.4 billion and $16.5 billion, respectively, of residential first-lien mortgages, and $2.8 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively, of commercial first-lien mortgages. Residential mortgage loans include conforming mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell to U.S. government agencies of $7.2 billion and $11.0 billion, respectively, and reverse mortgages of $2.0 billion for both periods.

(c)

Physical commodities inventories are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or net realizable value. “Net realizable value” is a term defined in U.S. GAAP as not exceeding fair value less costs to sell (“transaction costs”). Transaction costs for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories are either not applicable or immaterial to the value of the inventory. Therefore, net realizable value approximates fair value for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories. When fair value hedging has been applied (or when net realizable value is below cost), the carrying value of physical commodities approximates fair value, because under fair value hedge accounting, the cost basis is adjusted for changes in fair value. For a further discussion of the Firm’s hedge accounting relationships, see Note 4. To provide consistent fair value disclosure information, all physical commodities inventories have been included in each period presented.

(d)	Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased (short positions).

---

(e)

As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. For purposes of the tables above, the Firm does not reduce derivative receivables and derivative payables balances for this netting adjustment, either within or across the levels of the fair value hierarchy, as such netting is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. The level 3 balances would be reduced if netting were applied, including the netting benefit associated with cash collateral.

(f)

Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient are not required to be classified in the fair value hierarchy. At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the fair values of these investments, which include certain hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate and other funds, were both $1.0 billion. Included in the balances at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, were trading assets of $53 million and $52 million, respectively, and other assets of $979 million and $977 million, respectively.

---

(a)	The categories presented in the table have been aggregated based upon the product type, which may differ from their classification on the Consolidated balance sheets. Furthermore, the inputs presented for each valuation technique in the table are, in some cases, not applicable to every instrument valued using the technique as the characteristics of the instruments can differ.

(b)	Includes U.S. government agency securities of $340 million, nonagency securities of $36 million and trading loans of $2.2 billion.

(c)	Includes U.S. government agency securities of $13 million, nonagency securities of $45 million, trading loans of $677 million and non-trading loans of $402 million.

(d)	Includes trading loans of $1.7 billion and non-trading loans of $2 million.

(e)	Long-term debt, other borrowed funds and deposits include structured notes issued by the Firm that are predominantly financial instruments containing embedded derivatives. The estimation of the fair value of structured notes includes the derivative features embedded within the instrument. The significant unobservable inputs are broadly consistent with those presented for derivative receivables.

(f)	Includes level 3 assets and liabilities that are insignificant both individually and in aggregate.

(g)	Price is a significant unobservable input for certain instruments. When quoted market prices are not readily available, reliance is generally placed on price-based internal valuation techniques. The price input is expressed assuming a par value of $100.

---

---

---

(a)	All level 3 derivatives are presented on a net basis, irrespective of the underlying counterparty.

(b)	Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total Firm liabilities accounted for at fair value (including liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) was 12% at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

---

(c)	Predominantly reported in principal transactions revenue, except for changes in fair value for CCB mortgage loans and lending-related commitments originated with the intent to sell, and mortgage loan purchase commitments, which are reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(d)

Realized gains/(losses) on AFS securities, as well as other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses that are recorded in earnings, are reported in securities gains. Unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in OCI. Realized gains/(losses) and foreign exchange hedge accounting adjustments recorded in income on AFS securities were zero for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Unrealized gains/(losses) recorded on AFS securities in OCI were $10 million and $(8) million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(e)	Changes in fair value for CCB MSRs are reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(f)	Predominantly reported in other income.

(g)	Loan originations are included in purchases.

(h)	Includes financial assets and liabilities that have matured, been partially or fully repaid, impacts of modifications, and deconsolidation associated with beneficial interests in VIEs.

(i)	All transfers into and/or out of level 3 are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarterly reporting period in which they occur.

---

(a)	Includes the Firm’s student loan portfolio, which was transferred to held-for-sale in the first quarter of 2017. For additional information see Note 24.

(b)

Of the $464 million in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2017, $182 million related to residential real estate loans carried at the net realizable value of the underlying collateral (i.e., collateral-dependent loans and other loans charged off in accordance with regulatory guidance). These amounts are classified as level 3 as they are valued using a broker’s price opinion and discounted based upon the Firm’s experience with actual liquidation values. These discounts to the broker price opinions ranged from 20% to 48% with a weighted average of 29%.

---

(a)

Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the characteristics of the underlying loans (including principal, contractual interest rate and contractual fees) and other key inputs, including expected lifetime credit losses, interest rates, prepayment rates, and primary origination or secondary market spreads. For certain loans, the fair value is measured based on the value of the underlying collateral. The difference between the estimated fair value and carrying value of a financial asset or liability is the result of the different methodologies used to determine fair value as compared with carrying value. For example, credit losses are estimated for a financial asset’s remaining life in a fair value calculation but are estimated for a loss emergence period in the allowance for loan loss calculation; future loan income (interest and fees) is incorporated in a fair value calculation but is generally not considered in the allowance for loan losses. For a further discussion of the Firm’s methodologies for estimating the fair value of loans and lending-related commitments, see Valuation hierarchy on pages 150–153 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2016 Annual Report.

(a)	Excludes the current carrying values of the guarantee liability and the offsetting asset, each of which is recognized at fair value at the inception of the guarantees.

---

(a)

Unrealized gains/(losses) due to instrument-specific credit risk (DVA) for liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded in OCI, while realized gains/(losses) are recorded in principal transactions revenue. Realized gains/(losses) due to instrument-specific credit risk recorded in principal transaction revenue were not material for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(b)	Long-term debt measured at fair value predominantly relates to structured notes containing embedded derivatives. Although the risk associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains/(losses) reported in this table do not include the income statement impact of the risk management instruments used to manage such risk.

(c)	Reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(d)	Reported in other income.

---

(a)	There were no performing loans that were ninety days or more past due as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.

(b)

Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected notes. Unlike principal-protected structured notes, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of principal at the maturity of the note, nonprincipal-protected structured notes do not obligate the Firm to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but to return an amount based on the performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note. However, investors are exposed to the credit risk of the Firm as issuer for both nonprincipal-protected and principal protected notes.

(c)	Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance reflects the contractual principal payment at maturity or, if applicable, the contractual principal payment at the Firm’s next call date.

---

---

---

(a)	Balances exclude structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected. See Note 3 for further information.

(b)	As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral receivables and payables when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists.

---

•	collateral that consists of non-cash financial instruments (generally U.S. government and agency securities and other G7 government bonds) and cash collateral held at third party custodians, which are shown separately as “Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets” in the tables below, up to the fair value exposure amount.

•	the amount of collateral held or transferred that exceeds the fair value exposure at the individual counterparty level, as of the date presented, which is excluded from the tables below; and

•	collateral held or transferred that relates to derivative receivables or payables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained with respect to the master netting agreement, which is excluded from the tables below.

---

(a)	Exchange-traded derivative balances that relate to futures contracts are settled daily.

(b)	Net derivatives receivable included cash collateral netted of $59.8 billion and $71.9 billion at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively. Net derivatives payable included cash collateral netted of $48.0 billion and $57.3 billion related to OTC and OTC-cleared derivatives at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.

(c)	Excludes all collateral related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained.

(d)

Represents liquid security collateral as well as cash collateral held at third party custodians related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has been obtained. For some counterparties, the collateral amounts of financial instruments may exceed the derivative receivables and derivative payables balances. Where this is the case, the total amount reported is limited to the net derivative receivables and net derivative payables balances with that counterparty.

(e)	Derivative payables collateral relates only to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative instruments. Amounts exclude collateral transferred related to exchange-traded derivative instruments.

---

(a)	Includes the additional collateral to be posted for initial margin.

(b)	Amounts represent fair values of derivative payables, and do not reflect collateral posted.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of hedges of the benchmark (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) interest rate risk of fixed-rate long-term debt and AFS securities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income.

(b)	Excludes the amortization expense associated with the inception hedge accounting adjustment applied to the hedged item. This expense is recorded in net interest income and substantially offsets the income statement impact of the excluded components.

(c)	Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of long-term debt and AFS securities for changes in spot foreign currency rates. Gains and losses related to the derivatives and the hedged items, due to changes in foreign currency rates, were recorded primarily in principal transactions revenue and net interest income.

(d)	Consists of overall fair value hedges of physical commodities inventories that are generally carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value (net realizable value approximates fair value). Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.

(e)	Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument does not exactly offset the gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

(f)	The assessment of hedge effectiveness excludes certain components of the changes in fair values of the derivatives and hedged items such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts and time values.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of benchmark interest rate hedges of LIBOR-indexed floating-rate assets and floating-rate liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income.

(b)	Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and expense. The income statement classification of gains and losses follows the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue and compensation expense.

(c)	Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the cumulative gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument exceeds the present value of the cumulative expected change in cash flows on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

(a)

Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. Amounts related to excluded components are recorded in other income. The Firm measures the ineffectiveness of net investment hedge accounting relationships based on changes in spot foreign currency rates, and, therefore, there was no significant ineffectiveness for net investment hedge accounting relationships during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

---

---

(a)	Other credit derivatives largely consists of credit swap options.

(b)	Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference instrument is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold.

(c)	Does not take into account the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement, which would generally reduce the amount the seller of protection pays to the buyer of protection in determining settlement value.

(d)	Represents protection purchased by the Firm on referenced instruments (single-name, portfolio or index) where the Firm has not sold any protection on the identical reference instrument.

(a)	The ratings scale is primarily based on external credit ratings defined by S&P and Moody’s.

(b)	Amounts are shown on a gross basis, before the benefit of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral received by the Firm.

---

---

---

(a)	Includes various defined benefit pension plans which are individually immaterial.

---

(a)	Included total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations with fair values of $47.9 billion and $45.8 billion at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, which were predominantly mortgage-related.

(b)	Included total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations with amortized cost of $24.6 billion and $25.6 billion at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, which were mortgage-related.

---

---

---

(a)	As of March 31, 2017, mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae exceeded 10% of JPMorgan Chase’s total stockholders’ equity; the amortized cost and fair value of such securities was $55.4 billion and $56.4 billion, respectively.

---

(b)

Average yield is computed using the effective yield of each security owned at the end of the period, weighted based on the amortized cost of each security. The effective yield considers the contractual coupon, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. The effective yield excludes unscheduled principal prepayments; and accordingly, actual maturities of securities may differ from their contractual or expected maturities as certain securities may be prepaid.

(c)

Includes securities with no stated maturity. Substantially all of the Firm’s U.S. residential MBS and collateralized mortgage obligations are due in 10 years or more, based on contractual maturity. The estimated weighted-average life, which reflects anticipated future prepayments, is approximately 7 years for agency residential MBS, 3 years for agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations and 3 years for nonagency residential collateralized mortgage obligations.

(a)	Includes securities-for-securities lending transactions of $10.9 billion and $9.1 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, accounted for at fair value, where the Firm is acting as lender. These amounts are presented within other liabilities in the Consolidated balance sheets.

(b)

Includes securities financing agreements accounted for at fair value. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, included securities purchased under resale agreements of $18.4 billion and $21.5 billion, respectively and securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $730 million and $687 million, respectively. There were $77 million of securities borrowed at March 31, 2017 and there were no securities borrowed at December 31, 2016. There were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value in either period.

(c)	In some cases, collateral exchanged with a counterparty exceeds the net asset or liability balance with that counterparty. In such cases, the amounts reported in this column are limited to the related asset or liability with that counterparty.

(d)

Includes securities financing agreements that provide collateral rights, but where an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the master netting agreement has not been either sought or obtained. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, included $8.7 billion and $4.8 billion, respectively, of securities purchased under resale agreements; $22.2 billion and $27.1 billion, respectively, of securities borrowed; $12.1 billion and $15.9 billion, respectively, of securities sold under agreements to repurchase; and $96 million and $90 million, respectively, of securities loaned and other.

---

(a)	Includes securities-for-securities lending transactions of $10.9 billion and $9.1 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, accounted for at fair value, where the Firm is acting as lender. These amounts are presented within other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets.

---

(a)	Includes loans held in CCB, prime mortgage and home equity loans held in AWM and prime mortgage loans held in Corporate.

(b)	Includes senior and junior lien home equity loans.

(c)	Predominantly includes prime (including option ARMs) and subprime loans.

(d)	Includes certain business banking and auto dealer risk-rated loans that apply the wholesale methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses; these loans are managed by CCB, and therefore, for consistency in presentation, are included with the other consumer loan classes.

(e)	Predominantly includes Business Banking loans.

(f)	Includes loans held in CIB, CB, AWM and Corporate. Excludes prime mortgage and home equity loans held in AWM and prime mortgage loans held in Corporate. Classes are internally defined and may not align with regulatory definitions.

(g)	Includes loans to: individuals; SPEs; and private education and civic organizations. For more information on SPEs, see Note 16 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2016 Annual Report.

(a)	Includes the Firm’s student loan portfolio, which was transferred to held-for-sale in the first quarter of 2017. For additional information see Note 24.

(b)	Includes accrued interest and fees net of an allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued interest and fee income.

(c)	Loans (other than PCI loans and loans for which the fair value option has been elected) are presented net of unearned income, unamortized discounts and premiums, and net deferred loan costs. These amounts were not material as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016.

---

(a)

Purchases predominantly represent the Firm’s voluntary repurchase of certain delinquent loans from loan pools as permitted by Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) guidelines. The Firm typically elects to repurchase these delinquent loans as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with applicable requirements of Ginnie Mae, FHA, RHS, and/or VA.

(b)	Excludes purchases of retained loans sourced through the correspondent origination channel and underwritten in accordance with the Firm’s standards. Such purchases were $5.4 billion and $8.7 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(c)	Includes the Firm’s student loan portfolio, which was transferred to held-for-sale in the first quarter of 2017. For additional information see Note 24.

(a)	Excludes sales related to loans accounted for at fair value.

(b)	Includes the Firm’s student loan portfolio, which was transferred to held-for-sale in the first quarter of 2017. For additional information see Note 24.

---

(a)	Individual delinquency classifications include mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies as follows: current included $3.0 billion and $2.5 billion; 30–149 days past due included $2.6 billion and $3.1 billion; and 150 or more days past due included $3.6 billion and $3.8 billion at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.

(b)	At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, residential mortgage loans excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $6.2 billion and $6.9 billion, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee.

(c)

These balances, which are 90 days or more past due, were excluded from nonaccrual loans as the loans are guaranteed by U.S government agencies. Typically the principal balance of the loans is insured and interest is guaranteed at a specified reimbursement rate subject to meeting agreed-upon servicing guidelines. At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, these balances included $2.0 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively, of loans that are no longer accruing interest based on the agreed-upon servicing guidelines. For the remaining balance, interest is being accrued at the guaranteed reimbursement rate. There were no loans that were not guaranteed by U.S. government agencies that are 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016.

(d)

Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property.

(e)	Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis.

(f)	At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, included mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $9.2 billion and $9.4 billion, respectively.

(g)	Certain loan portfolios have been reclassified. The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

---

(a)

Represents collateral-dependent residential real estate loans that are charged off to the fair value of the underlying collateral less cost to sell. The Firm reports, in accordance with regulatory guidance, residential real estate loans that have been discharged under Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower (“Chapter 7 loans”) as collateral-dependent nonaccrual TDRs, regardless of their delinquency status. At March 31, 2017, Chapter 7 residential real estate loans included approximately 12% of home equity and 15% of residential mortgages that were 30 days or more past due.

(b)

At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, $3.8 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, of loans modified subsequent to repurchase from Ginnie Mae in accordance with the standards of the appropriate government agency (i.e., FHA, VA, RHS) are not included in the table above. When such loans perform subsequent to modification in accordance with Ginnie Mae guidelines, they are generally sold back into Ginnie Mae loan pools. Modified loans that do not re-perform become subject to foreclosure.

(c)	Predominantly all residential real estate impaired loans, excluding PCI loans, are in the U.S.

(d)	Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors including charge-offs, net deferred loan fees or costs, and unamortized discounts or premiums on purchased loans.

(e)	At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, nonaccrual loans included $2.3 billion of TDRs for which the borrowers were less than 90 days past due. For additional information about loans modified in a TDR that are on nonaccrual status refer, to the Loan accounting framework in Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2016 Annual Report.

---

(a)	Generally, interest income on loans modified in TDRs is recognized on a cash basis until such time as the borrower has made a minimum of six payments under the new terms, unless the loan is deemed to be collateral-dependent.

(a)	Represents concessions granted in permanent modifications as a percentage of the number of loans permanently modified. The sum of the percentages exceeds 100% because predominantly all of the modifications include more than one type of concession. A significant portion of trial modifications include interest rate reductions and/or term or payment extensions.

(b)	Predominantly represents variable interest rate to fixed interest rate modifications.

---

(a)

Represents loans permanently modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The dollar amounts presented represent the balance of such loans at the end of the reporting period in which such loans defaulted. For residential real estate loans modified in TDRs, payment default is deemed to occur when the loan becomes two contractual payments past due. In the event that a modified loan redefaults, it is probable that the loan will ultimately be liquidated through foreclosure or another similar type of liquidation transaction. Redefaults of loans modified within the last 12 months may not be representative of ultimate redefault levels.

---

(a)	There were no loans that were 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016.

(b)	For risk-rated business banking and auto loans, the primary credit quality indicator is the risk rating of the loan, including whether the loans are considered to be criticized and/or nonaccrual.

(c)	Certain loan portfolios have been reclassified. The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

---

---

(a)	Carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition.

(b)	Management concluded as part of the Firm’s regular assessment of the PCI loan pools that it was probable that higher expected credit losses would result in a decrease in expected cash flows. As a result, an allowance for loan losses for impairment of these pools has been recognized.

(c)

Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property.

(d)	Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis.

---

---

---

(a)	The U.S. and non-U.S. distribution is determined based predominantly on the domicile of the borrower.

(b)	The credit quality of wholesale loans is assessed primarily through ongoing review and monitoring of an obligor’s ability to meet contractual obligations rather than relying on the past due status, which is generally a lagging indicator of credit quality. For further discussion, see Note 14 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2016 Annual Report.

(c)	Represents loans that are considered well-collateralized and therefore still accruing interest.

(d)	Includes loans to: individuals; SPEs; and private education and civic organizations. For more information on SPEs, see Note 16 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2016 Annual Report.

---

(a)	When the discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the recorded investment in the loan, the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs when the impaired loans have been partially charged-off and/or there have been interest payments received and applied to the loan balance.

(b)	Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs; interest payments received and applied to the carrying value; net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discount or premiums on purchased loans.

(c)	Based upon the domicile of the borrower, largely consists of loans in the U.S.

---

(a)	Write-offs of PCI loans are recorded against the allowance for loan losses when actual losses for a pool exceed estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. A write-off of a PCI loan is recognized when the underlying loan is removed from a pool (e.g., upon liquidation).

(b)	Includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR.

(c)	The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses is related to loans that have been modified in a TDR; such allowance is calculated based on the loans’ original contractual interest rates and does not consider any incremental penalty rates.

---

---

(a)	Excludes U.S. government agency securitizations and re-securitizations, which are not Firm-sponsored. See page 128 of this Note for information on the Firm’s loan sales to U.S. government agencies.

(b)	Consists of securities backed by commercial loans (predominantly real estate) and non-mortgage-related consumer receivables purchased from third parties.

(c)

Excludes the following: retained servicing (see Note 15 for a discussion of MSRs); securities retained from loan sales to U.S. government agencies; interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives primarily used to manage interest rate and foreign exchange risks of securitization entities (See Note 4 for further information on derivatives); senior and subordinated securities of $202 million and $38 million, respectively, at March 31, 2017, and $180 million and $49 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016, which the Firm purchased in connection with CIB’s secondary market-making activities.

(d)	Includes interests held in re-securitization transactions.

(e)

As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, 61% of the Firm’s retained securitization interests, which are carried at fair value and include amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules, were risk-rated “A” or better, on an S&P-equivalent basis. The retained interests in prime residential mortgages consisted of $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion of investment-grade and $26 million and $77 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively. The retained interests in commercial and other securitizations trusts consisted of $2.0 billion and $2.4 billion of investment-grade and $249 million and $210 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.

---

---

(a)	Excludes intercompany transactions which are eliminated in consolidation.

(b)	Includes residential and commercial mortgage securitizations as well as re-securitizations.

(c)	Includes assets classified as cash and other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets.

(d)	The assets of the consolidated VIEs included in the program types above are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The difference between total assets and total liabilities recognized for consolidated VIEs represents the Firm’s interest in the consolidated VIEs for each program type.

(e)

The interest-bearing beneficial interest liabilities issued by consolidated VIEs are classified in the line item on the Consolidated balance sheets titled, “Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs.” The holders of these beneficial interests do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. Included in beneficial interests in VIE assets are long-term beneficial interests of $30.8 billion and $33.4 billion at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively. The maturities of the long-term beneficial interests as of March 31, 2017, were as follows: $11.9 billion under one year, $16.3 billion between one and five years, and $2.6 billion over five years.

(f)	Includes liabilities classified as accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets.

---

(a)	Excludes re-securitization transactions.

(b)	Includes cash paid by the Firm to reacquire assets from off–balance sheet, nonconsolidated entities – for example, loan repurchases due to representation and warranties and servicer clean-up calls.

(c)	Includes prime, Alt-A, subprime, and option ARMs. Excludes certain loan securitization transactions entered into with Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

(d)	Includes commercial mortgage and student loan securitizations.

---

---

---

(a)	Includes excess MSRs transferred to agency-sponsored trusts in exchange for stripped mortgage backed securities (“SMBS”). In each transaction, a portion of the SMBS was acquired by third parties at the transaction date; the Firm acquired the remaining balance of those SMBS as trading securities.

(b)	Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.

(c)	Represents changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates.

(d)

Represents amounts the Firm pays as the servicer (e.g., scheduled principal and interest, taxes and insurance), which will generally be reimbursed within a short period of time after the advance from future cash flows from the trust or the underlying loans. The Firm’s credit risk associated with these servicer advances is minimal because reimbursement of the advances is typically senior to all cash payments to investors. In addition, the Firm maintains the right to stop payment to investors if the collateral is insufficient to cover the advance. However, certain of these servicer advances may not be recoverable if they were not made in accordance with applicable rules and agreements.

---

(a)	Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.

(b)	Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service), discount rates and changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates (e.g., changes in prepayments due to changes in home prices).

---

---

(a)	Represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of securities accounted for as AFS, including net unamortized unrealized gains and losses related to AFS securities transferred to HTM.

(b)	Effective January 1, 2016, the Firm adopted new accounting guidance related to the recognition and measurement of financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected. This guidance requires the portion of the total change in fair value caused by changes in the Firm’s own credit risk (DVA) to be presented separately in OCI; previously these amounts were recognized in net income.

---

(a)	The pre-tax amount is reported in securities gains in the Consolidated statements of income.

(b)	Reclassifications of pre-tax realized gains/(losses) on translation adjustments and related hedges are reported in other income/expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The amounts were not material for the periods presented.

(c)	The pre-tax amounts are predominantly recorded in net interest income in the Consolidated statements of income.

(d)	The pre-tax amount is reported in compensation expense in the Consolidated statements of income.

---

---

---

---

(a)	Includes certain commitments to purchase loans from correspondents.

(b)	Certain loan portfolios have been reclassified. The prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.

(c)	Predominantly all consumer lending-related commitments are in the U.S.

(d)

At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, reflected the contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $355 million and $328 million, respectively, for other unfunded commitments to extend credit; $10.4 billion and $11.1 billion, respectively, for standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $330 million and $265 million, respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve these commitments are shown gross of risk participations.

(e)	At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the U.S. portion of the contractual amount of total wholesale lending-related commitments was 77% and 79%, respectively.

(f)	At March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, collateral held by the Firm in support of securities lending indemnification agreements was $155.4 billion and $143.2 billion, respectively. Securities lending collateral consists of primarily cash and securities issued by governments that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and U.S. government agencies.

(g)

Included unfunded commitments of $48 million at both March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, to third-party private equity funds; and $837 million and $1.0 billion, at March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, to other equity investments. These commitments included $32 million and $34 million, respectively, related to investments that are generally fair valued at net asset value as discussed in Note 2. In addition, included letters of credit hedged by derivative transactions and managed on a market risk basis of $4.6 billion at both March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016.

(h)	For lending-related products, the carrying value represents the allowance for lending-related commitments and the guarantee liability; for derivative-related products, the carrying value represents the fair value.

---

(a)	The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal ratings which generally correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Segment managed results reflect revenue on a FTE basis with the corresponding income tax impact recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results.

---

---

---

(a)	Represents securities which are tax exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

(b)	Includes margin loans.

(c)	Includes brokerage customer payables.

(d)	Included trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments of $94,086 million and $87,718 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(e)	Interest includes the effect of certain related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable.

(f)	Negative interest income and yield is a result of increased client-driven demand for certain securities combined with the impact of low interest rates; this is matched book activity and the negative interest expense on the corresponding securities loaned is recognized in interest expense and reported within trading liabilities – debt, short-term and other liabilities.

(g)	For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the annualized rates for securities, based on amortized cost, were 3.04% and 3.03%, respectively; this does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected in AOCI.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Excludes commissions cost.

(b)	Represents the amount remaining under the $10.6 billion repurchase program that was authorized by the Board of Directors on June 29, 2016.

---

(a)	Filed herewith.

(b)	Furnished herewith. This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(c)

Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, includes the following financial information included in the Firm’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the Consolidated statements of income (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (ii) the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Consolidated balance sheets (unaudited) as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, (iv) the Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (v) the Consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).

---

---

---

---

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of JPMorgan Chase & Co.