Term Sheet
To prospectus dated November 21, 2008,
prospectus supplement dated November 21, 2008 and
product supplement no. 187-A-II dated April 29, 2010

  Term Sheet to
Product Supplement No. 187-A-II
Registration Statement No. 333-155535
Dated May 7, 2010; Rule 433

     

Structured 
Investments 

     

$
Return Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index due May 20, 2011

General

Key Terms

Index:

The J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index (the “Contag Beta AB ER Index” or the “Underlying”).

Payment at Maturity:

Payment at maturity will reflect the performance of the Underlying, minus the Deduction Amount plus the Additional Amount. Your payment at maturity per $1,000 principal amount note will be calculated as follows:

 

$1,000 x (1 + Underlying Return) – Deduction Amount + Additional Amount

 

You may lose some or all of your investment at maturity if the Ending Underlying Value is less than the Initial Underlying Value.

Deduction Amount:

$5.50 for each $1,000 principal amount note, which is equal to 0.55% of the principal amount of the note and reflects an index fee. See footnote 1 to “Fees and Commissions” on the cover of this term sheet.

Additional Amount:

An amount not less than $5.50 and not greater than $6.50 for each $1,000 principal amount note, which will be determined on the pricing date. The Additional Amount is a fixed amount payable at maturity that is intended to approximate interest that would have been payable on each $1,000 principal amount note over the term of the notes based on current interest rates as determined by the calculation agent if the notes were interest-bearing. Accordingly, because the Deduction Amount is $5.50 for each $1,000 principal amount note, your payment at maturity will reflect, in addition to the performance of the Underlying, a net additional amount of between $0 and $1.00 for each $1,000 principal amount note (the “Net Additional Amount”).

Underlying Return:

Ending Underlying Value – Initial Underlying Value 
                  Initial Underlying Value

Initial Underlying Value:

The Underlying closing value on the pricing date, which is expected to be on or about May 10, 2010

Ending Underlying Value:

The Underlying closing value on the Observation Date

Observation Date:

May 17, 2011

Maturity Date:

May 20, 2011

CUSIP:

 

Subject to postponement in the event of a market disruption event and as described under “Description of Notes — Payment at Maturity” in the accompanying product supplement no. 187-A-II or early acceleration in the event of a hedging disruption event as described under “General Terms of Notes—Consequences of a Commodity Hedging Disruption Event” in the accompanying product supplement no. 187-A-II and in “Selected Risk Considerations—Commodity Futures Contracts Are Subject to Uncertain Legal and Regulatory Regimes” in this term sheet.

Investing in the Return Notes involves a number of risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page PS-6 of the accompanying product supplement no. 187-A-II and “Selected Risk Considerations” beginning on page TS-2 of this term sheet.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, for the offering to which this term sheet relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement and the other documents relating to this offering that JPMorgan Chase & Co. has filed with the SEC for more complete information about JPMorgan Chase & Co. and this offering. You may get these documents without cost by visiting EDGAR on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, JPMorgan Chase & Co., any agent or any dealer participating in this offering will arrange to send you the prospectus, the prospectus supplement, product supplement no. 187-A-II and this term sheet if you so request by calling toll-free 866-535-9248.

You may revoke your offer to purchase the notes at any time prior to the time at which we accept such offer by notifying the applicable agent. We reserve the right to change the terms of, or reject any offer to purchase, the notes prior to their issuance. In the event of any changes to the terms of the notes, we will notify you and you will be asked to accept such changes in connection with your purchase. You may also choose to reject such changes in which case we may reject your offer to purchase.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the notes or passed upon the accuracy or the adequacy of this term sheet or the accompanying prospectus supplement and prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


 

Price to Public (1)

Fees and Commissions (1)

Proceeds to Us


Per note

$

$

$


Total

$

$

$


(1) The price to the public and fees and commissions include the expected cost of hedging our obligations under the notes through one or more of our affiliates. This hedging cost includes the profit our affiliates expect to realize in consideration for assuming the risks inherent in providing such hedge. J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., which we refer to as JPMSI, acting as agent for JPMorgan Chase & Co., will receive a commission of approximately 0.55% of the Principal Amount per note. For additional related information, please see “Use of Proceeds” beginning on page PS-19 of product supplement no. 187-A-II.

The notes are not bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency, nor are they obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.

May 7, 2010


ADDITIONAL TERMS SPECIFIC TO THE NOTES

You should read this term sheet together with the prospectus dated November 21, 2008, as supplemented by the prospectus supplement dated November 21, 2008 relating to our Series E medium-term notes of which these notes are a part, and the more detailed information contained in product supplement no. 187-A-II dated April 29, 2010. This term sheet, together with the documents listed below, contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as any other written materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms, correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation, sample structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of ours. You should carefully consider, among other things, the matters set forth in “Risk Factors” in the accompanying product supplement no. 187-A-II, as the notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt securities. We urge you to consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the notes.

You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by reviewing our filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):

Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 19617. As used in this term sheet, the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refers to JPMorgan Chase & Co.

J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index

The J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index, is a notional rules-based proprietary index developed by J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. (“JPMSL”), which is intended to capture the return of the synthetic exposure to a notional basket consisting of 19 commodities, each of which is represented by a commodity futures contract selected by a methodology developed by JPMSL, which we refer to as the “Selection Methodology.” The Selection Methodology uses, along with other criteria, the slope of the futures curve for each eligible commodity to select the futures contract for each eligible commodity with the highest level of backwardation (or in the absence of backwardation, the least amount of contango). “Backwardation” refers to the situation where the futures contracts for a commodity with a delivery month further in time have lower contract prices than futures contracts for the same commodity with a delivery month closer in time. If there is no futures contract for one or more eligible commodities with backwardation, the Selection Methodology will select the futures contract with the lowest level of contango for any such commodities. “Contango” refers to the situation where the futures contracts for a commodity with a delivery month further in time have higher contract prices than futures contracts for the same commodity with a delivery month closer in time.

The J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index is an excess return index. An excess return index reflects synthetic exposure to uncollateralized positions in the futures contracts underlying such index, including the appreciation (or depreciation) of the applicable futures contract(s) and profit or loss realized when rolling such contracts.

The weights assigned to the commodities represented in the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index are based on the Commodity Index Percentages of the Dow Jones —UBS Commodity IndexSM. For more information on how the commodity weights of the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index are defined, please see “The J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Indices — Calculation and Publication of the Index Level — Commodity Weights” and “Background on the Dow Jones —UBS Commodity IndexSM” in the accompanying product supplement.

The value of the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index is published each trading day under the Bloomberg ticker symbol “JCTABDJE.” For more information about the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index, see “The J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Indices” in the accompanying product supplement.

Selected Purchase Considerations


JPMorgan Structured Investments —
Return Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index due May 20, 2011

 TS-1

“IRS”) or a court may not respect this characterization or treatment of the notes, in which case the timing and character of any income or loss on the notes could be significantly and adversely affected. In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting comments on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments, which might include the notes. The notice focuses in particular on whether to require holders of these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment. It also asks for comments on a number of related topics, including the character of income or loss with respect to these instruments; the relevance of factors such as the nature of the underlying property to which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any, to which income (including any mandated accruals) realized by Non-U.S. Holders should be subject to withholding tax; and whether these instruments are or should be subject to the “constructive ownership” regime, which very generally can operate to recharacterize certain long-term capital gain as ordinary income and impose an interest charge. While the notice requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates, any Treasury regulations or other guidance promulgated after consideration of these issues could materially and adversely affect the tax consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with retroactive effect. Both U.S. and Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the notes, including possible alternative treatments and the issues presented by this notice. Non-U.S. Holders should also note that they may be withheld upon at a rate of up to 30% unless they have submitted a properly completed IRS Form W-8BEN or otherwise satisfied the applicable documentation requirements.

The discussion in the preceding paragraph, when read in combination with the section entitled “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product supplement, constitutes the full opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP regarding the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of notes.

Selected Risk Considerations

An investment in the notes involves significant risks. Investing in the notes is not equivalent to investing directly in the Underlying, any futures contracts underlying the Underlying, or any futures contracts or exchange-traded or over-the-counter instruments based on, or other instruments linked to, the Underlying. These risks are explained in more detail in the “Risk Factors” section of the accompanying product supplement no. 187-A-II dated April 29, 2010.


JPMorgan Structured Investments —
Return Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index due May 20, 2011

 TS-2

JPMorgan Structured Investments —
Return Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index due May 20, 2011

 TS-3

JPMorgan Structured Investments —
Return Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index due May 20, 2011

 TS-4

What Is the Payment at Maturity on the Notes, Assuming a Range of Performances for the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index?

The following table illustrates the hypothetical payments at maturity for each $1,000 principal amount note. The hypothetical payments at maturity set forth below assume an Initial Underlying Value of 285 and an Additional Amount of $6.00 for each $1,000 principal amount note (the midpoint of the range of $5.50 and $6.50) and reflect the Deduction Amount of $5.50 for each $1,000 principal amount note. The Additional Amount will be determined on the pricing date and will not be less than $5.50 or greater than $6.50 per $1,000 principal amount note. If the actual Additional Amount as determined on the pricing date is less than $6.00, your payment at maturity will be lower than the hypothetical payments at maturity shown below. The hypothetical payments at maturity set forth below are for illustrative purposes only and may not be the actual payment at maturity applicable to a purchaser of the notes. The numbers appearing in the following table and examples have been rounded for ease of analysis.


Ending
Underlying
Value

Underlying
Return

$1,000 x
(1 + Index
Return)

 

Deduction
Amount

 

Additional
Amount

 

Payment at
Maturity


513.00

80.00%

$1,800.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,800.50

484.50

70.00%

$1,700.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,700.50

456.00

60.00%

$1,600.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,600.50

427.50

50.00%

$1,500.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,500.50

399.00

40.00%

$1,400.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,400.50

370.50

30.00%

$1,300.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,300.50

342.00

20.00%

$1,200.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,200.50

313.50

10.00%

$1,100.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,100.50

299.25

5.00%

$1,050.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,050.50

286.43

0.50%

$1,005.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,005.50

285.00

0.00%

$1,000.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$1,000.50

256.50

-10.00%

$900.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$900.50

228.00

-20.00%

$800.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$800.50

199.50

-30.00%

$700.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$700.50

171.00

-40.00%

$600.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$600.50

142.50

-50.00%

$500.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$500.50

114.00

-60.00%

$400.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$400.50

85.50

-70.00%

$300.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$300.50

57.00

-80.00%

$200.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$200.50

28.50

-90.00%

$100.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$100.50

0.00

-100.00%

$0.00

-

$5.50

+

$6.00

=

$0.50


Hypothetical Examples of Amounts Payable at Maturity

The following examples illustrate how the payments at maturity set forth in the table above are calculated.

Example 1: The value of the Underlying increases from the Initial Underlying Value of 285 to an Ending Underlying Value of 299.25. Because the Ending Underlying Value of 299.25 is greater than the Initial Underlying Value of 285, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $1,050.50 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:

$1,000 x (1 + 5%) – $5.50 + $6.00 = $1,050.50

Example 2: The value of the Underlying decreases from the Initial Underlying Value of 285 to an Ending Underlying Value of 228. Because the Ending Underlying Value of 228 is less than the Initial Underlying Value of 285, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $800.50 per $1,000 principal amount note, calculated as follows:

$1,000 x (1 + -20%) – $5.50 + $6.00 = $800.50

Example 3: The value of the Underlying decreases from the Initial Underlying Value of 285 to an Ending Underlying Value of 0. Because the Ending Underlying Value of 0 is less than the Initial Underlying Value of 285, the investor receives a payment at maturity of $0.50 per $1,000 principal amount note, which reflects the Net Additional Amount of $0.50 (the difference between the Additional Amount and the Deduction Amount), calculated as follows:

$1,000 x (1 + -100%) – $5.50 +$6.00 = $0.50


JPMorgan Structured Investments —
Return Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index due May 20, 2011

 TS-5
 

Hypothetical Back-tested Data and Historical Information

The following graph sets forth the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Underlying based on the hypothetical back-tested weekly Underlying closing values from January 7, 2005 through October 23, 2009, and the historical performance of the Underlying based on the weekly Underlying closing values from October 30, 2009 through April 30, 2010. The Underlying was established on October 30, 2009. The Underlying closing value on May 6, 2010 was 286.4998. We obtained the Underlying closing values below from Bloomberg Financial Markets. We make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information obtained from Bloomberg Financial Markets.

The hypothetical back-tested and historical values of the Underlying should not be taken as an indication of future performance, and no assurance can be given as to the Underlying closing value on the pricing date or the Observation Date. We cannot give you assurance that the performance of the Underlying will result in the return of any of your initial investment at maturity. The data for the hypothetical back-tested performance of the Underlying set forth in the following graph was calculated on materially the same basis on which the performance of the Underlying is now calculated but does not represent the actual historical performance of the Underlying.

The hypothetical historical values above have not been verified by an independent third party. The back-tested, hypothetical historical results above have inherent limitations. These back-tested results are achieved by means of a retroactive application of a back-tested model designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is made that an investment in the notes will or is likely to achieve returns similar to those shown.

Alternative modeling techniques or assumptions would produce different hypothetical historical information that might prove to be more appropriate and that might differ significantly from the hypothetical historical information set forth above. Hypothetical back-tested results are neither an indicator nor guarantee of future returns. Actual results will vary, perhaps materially, from the analysis implied in the hypothetical historical information that forms part of the information contained in the chart above.


JPMorgan Structured Investments —
Return Notes Linked to the J.P. Morgan Contag Beta Alternate Benchmark Class A Excess Return Index due May 20, 2011

 TS-6